Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano
1.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2009625

RESUMO

Background: Treatment options for patients with HSPC have broadened, and data regarding patient preferences for therapies can aid in therapeutic decision-making. This study evaluated the impact of attributes associated with therapies for US patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) or metastatic HSPC (mHSPC) from the perspective of patient preferences. Methods: An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was developed for patients with LAPC or mHSPC. The DCE included 12 questions designed to systematically require tradeoffs between treatment attributes of efficacy (5-year overall survival [OS]), tolerability (fatigue, skin rash, neurotoxicity, and common chemotherapy-related toxicity), and convenience (administration factors [route, frequency, and setting], concomitant use of steroids, and monitoring requirements). Respondents could choose androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with hypothetical therapies that improved 5-year OS but had additional adverse events (AEs). Attribute-specific importance weights measuring their relative impact on treatment choices were estimated using a mixed-logit model, which also controlled for heterogeneity in preferences. Results: From September 3 to October 14, 2021, 82 respondents (mean age 61 years) completed the survey (LAPC, n = 40;mHSPC, n = 42), with 61 (74.4%) receiving ADT at the time of the survey. Respondents reported treatment efficacy (36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22, 49]) as the most important aspect of treatment choice, followed by changes in chemotherapy-related toxicity (13% [95% CI 3, 22]) and the need for concomitant steroid use (12% [95% CI 5, 19]). Respondents considered monitoring requirements (8% [95% CI 5, 19]) to be more important than fatigue (5% [95% CI 2, 13]). Administration factors were comparable in importance to therapy AEs (Table). Respondents preferred, by at least 10 percentage points, adding therapies to ADT that could improve 5-year OS, at the detriment of additional AEs. Conclusions: After efficacy, convenience was considered to impact treatment choices at a rate comparable to tolerability issues, potentially influenced by perceived COVID-19 exposure risks. Patients with LAPC and mHSPC prioritize efficacy despite the detriment of additional AEs.

2.
Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology ; 20(7):407, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1955707
3.
Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology ; 20(5):263, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1885150
4.
Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology ; 19(2):59, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1175970
5.
Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology ; 18(12):762, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1158609
6.
Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology ; 18(6):299, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-825389
7.
Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology ; 18(8):434, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-734677
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA